FAQ

About the project

It’s the empirical observation — not an ironclad law — that established democracies almost never go to war with one another. It has real, debated exceptions, and no theory of peace is airtight. But among the available frameworks for reducing war between nations, it has the strongest track record, and the UDN is a bet that strengthening it is worth doing despite its imperfections. For a fuller treatment of the theory and its critics, see Wikipedia’s entry on democratic peace theory.

No. The UDN is an independent, non-governmental project. It has no formal relationship with the United Nations, any national government, or any international body. Certification here reflects the judgment of fellow UDN members.

Not today. No government or international body recognizes it. The UDN is a working test of whether democratic legitimacy can be measured and certified by peer nations, rather than declared unilaterally — if that idea has value, its reach will grow from here.

Consider Egypt: in 2011, mass protests forced out a dictator who had ruled for three decades. What followed was a contested elected government, a military coup, and ultimately a new ruler no less authoritarian than the one removed. Removing a dictator didn’t produce democracy — and there was no ongoing, independent standard by which the world could measure whether what replaced him actually was one. That gap is exactly what the UDN is built to close.

Membership & seats

Check the Member column on the Introduction page’s table — it lists whoever currently holds your nation’s seat.

If you believe you hold a stronger electoral mandate than your country’s current UDN member, you may be entitled to the seat. See the Members page for how mandate is assessed, and contact the UDN to make your case — you’ll be asked for evidence such as a link to official election results.

Initially, seat disputes are resolved administratively by comparing electoral mandates. Once the UDN completes its first annual voting cycle with at least 50 active member nations, the authority to arbitrate seat claims will transfer to the members.

Voting & certification

There’s no precise checklist for democracy, but the core of it is this: a government’s actions ultimately answer to the will of the people, expressed through the electoral process. It’s not a measure of wise governance — only accountability. One caveat: that accountability only covers people who actually get a vote. A government that inflicts real harm on a population outside its own electorate — invading a neighboring people, for instance — counts against its own democratic legitimacy, not an exception to it.

It’s a deliberate compromise, not a claim that population shouldn’t matter. Weighting votes by population would require agreeing on a formula — whose census data, how current, how to handle disputed figures — and that becomes its own source of argument and manipulation. One nation, one vote is simple, hard to game, and treats every certified democracy as an equal peer in judging the others. It’s an imperfect trade-off, made deliberately in favor of the simpler, harder-to-game option.

There’s no fixed checklist and no outside authority. Each member nation’s representative judges independently — weighing things like free and fair elections, government accountability, and whether a nation has exported harm onto people who had no voice in its decisions (see “What constitutes democracy?” above). Certification requires a simple majority of votes cast. Legitimacy comes from the judgment of your democratic peers, not a bureaucracy.

It loses its own vote in the following year’s certification round, the same way it earned that vote in the first place: by the judgment of its peers.

Abstention would let members avoid taking a position on close calls, which defeats the point of a process built on peer judgment. Every eligible member votes on every nation but their own.

Trust & privacy

Yes — the Introduction page shows how each country voted, Yes and No, broken down by country name. Individual members’ names are never shown in that breakdown.

The Members page shows the current representative’s name for each country — that’s intentionally public, since it’s how you find out who to contact. The vote breakdown on Introduction shows only country names, not who cast which vote.

It’s stored using the same one-way hashing WordPress itself uses for its own accounts. No one — including site administrators — can view your password, only reset it.

Log In